Prospect Development
“Miguel Vargas only hit .195 and was a colossal failure in 2023. Michael Busch did even worse. The Dodgers need to do better in 2024 than Vargas and Busch!” — Actual Quote from an Actual Moron! DISCLAIMER: No Morons were injured during the production of this blog! I was…

“Miguel Vargas only hit .195 and was a colossal failure in 2023. Michael Busch did even worse. The Dodgers need to do better in 2024 than Vargas and Busch!” — Actual Quote from an Actual Moron!
DISCLAIMER: No Morons were injured during the production of this blog!
I was listening to MLB. Radio yesterday, and Harold Reynolds was talking about Ohtani going to the Dodgers. He said, “Really, what other team in pro sports just wins year after year? Only the Dodgers have for the past ten years, and they will for the next ten years. Who else would play like that? Not the Angels. Not the Giants. Not the Blue Jays. Not the Yankees or the Mets. Only the Dodgers. Of course, they have only won one championship in that period, but people just need to come to terms with the fact that the best team rarely wins the World Series under the new tournament format. It’s more of a crapshoot!”
Thank You, Harold, and what he says is true: No other team in baseball wins like the Dodgers, and they are poised to keep it up. However, to keep it up, you HAVE TO have Prospect Development, and if you think that since Miguel Vargas and Michael Busch were not good last year and, because of that, will not be good this year, you are one of those actual morons I wrote about earlier. PROGRESS FOR PROSPECTS IS NOT LINEAR! Remember that one, and also remember that a team cannot continually trade away prospects for older players and expect to stay relevant. Witness what has happened to the NY Yankees.
Also, certain free agents have a loss of draft picks attached to them – from those, stay away. The Dodgers have some young hitters that are at different stages of development. James Outman saw his development accelerated last season. Jonny DeLuca also performed well in a small sampling. Miguel Vargas was injured, and Michael Busch had limited opportunities, but I would not give up on either one. Busch is most likely to be traded because of his being LH and lack of a position… unless it is in a platoon with Mookie.
I have the highest regard for Miguel Vargas because he has improved at every level and played with older players in the process. He has improved his legwork and footspeed (he has made himself a plus runner). Austin Riley made his debut with the Braves at age 22. In 297 Plate Appearances, he hit .226 with a .279 OB% and had 108 strikeouts. Then he blossomed into an All-Star. Vargas had the deck stacked against him in 2023 as he tried to play through two broken fingers. 2024 is a new year, and he needs to play every day… probably in LF. He just turned 24 and is a favorite of vets like Betts, Smith, Heyward, and Freeman because he plays the game the right way and has that youthful enthusiasm. I think his time is now.
If you look at him and say, “Well, he only hit .195”, you are looking in the rearview mirror. I think he will hit .270+ with 15+ HR in 2024 if he is given the opportunity. He has 30 HR potential, but I am aiming low in his first season. Michael Busch could platoon with Mookie, who could play RF when a Lefty is on the mound, but I would prefer to leave Betts at 2B all the time.
If the Dodgers can pull off a deferred contract with Shohei, perhaps they can defer some of Yamamoto’s and Imanaga’s contracts. Giolito might be a nice re-hab project, but if they could overpay for Yamamoto and Imanaga and not lose any players or draft picks, they would be awesome. All they have to do is sign Kike and the two abovementioned pitchers. If they need another hitter, they can get one at the trade deadline in 2024.
A six-man rotation makes the most sense since the Japanese Players are used to it, and Buehler can use the additional rest.
- Yamamoto
- Buehler
- Miller
- Pepiot
- Imanaga
- Giolito, Stone, Sheehan
Let the Prospects Play.
Of course, there are still Cease, Burnes, and Adames, but they cost prospect capital. Hoard those prospects. I heard, “Well, the Dodgers will have to trade some prospects or lose them.” Well, they did. They traded Vivas (a prospect who was blocked) and Victor Gonzalez (a useful LHP) for a SS/3B who has a nice upside. Sweeney was the Yankees’ Number eight prospect. With the Dodgers, he is ranked #18 as the Dodgers Farm System is dramatically better than the Yankees. The Dodgers were frustrated with Victor’s lack of attention to conditioning and diet. He was a close friend of Julio Urias’s, which is all I have to say about it. I think the Dodgers will try and extend Will Smith, but both sides have to agree, so there is that!
Some of these prospects (maybe over half) will flame out, but you have to keep them to know… generally. Friedman has not usually traded away the good ones (witness the Manny Machado trade). I talked to someone who knew Sweeney from Louisville, and he has high hopes for him. “Great athlete, excellent bat speed, really hard worker, and is strong as an ox.” He thinks he will be a Corey Seager-type SS (hit first, so-so defense) or a solid third baseman, as he has an excellent arm. I am anxious to see him play. He has underachieved as a Yankee.
The Dodgers still have an abundance of RHP, like Stone, Frasso, Knack, Sheehan, Ryan, Martin, and Hurt. They could trade from that surplus – some of those pitchers will be outstanding. I still like Gavin Lux as a 2B or LF’er but not at SS. I know several baseball people who feel the same way! But, then again, I did not think there was a way in hell the Dodgers would sign Ohtani for over $400 Million, so what do I know?

More from Dodger Talk

Dodgers Food Trailer
I did this interview a couple of weeks ago with Chef Mike, who runs the Dodgers Food Trailer for the Great Lakes Loons. They are there for every home and road regular season and playoff game. They prepare three meals a day for approximately 50 people (players and coaches). Since games end late most evenings, they do not prepare breakfast. Many of their hotels have a complimentary breakfast anyway. However,…

Meet LAD 2026 Draft Picks 1-12
3 picks were High School players (2 SS and 1 OF). There was a college OF, college catcher, college SS, and 10 college pitchers. Of all the talk for a need for a catcher, the only catcher the Dodgers selected was Luke Bard, son of LAD bullpen coach Josh Bard. Bard was a 4th year senior from Houston Christian University. He is not a prospect, so the Dodgers are still…

Interview with Paul Beachy – Team Bus Driver For The Great Lakes Loons (LA Dodgers Minor League Team)
It’s been a few days since I did this interview. We have evidently been working my son-in-law (the video guy) like a rented mule at US Water Systems. However, I am taking him to London with me in a few days, so maybe Watford will buy him a pint as a tip, but he’s a dang Red Sox fan, so there is that! I thought that it would be interesting…

Thanks for Your Service: Chris Taylor
I was going to do this post when Chris announced he was retiring, then he changed his mind, but since the chances of him ever playing for the Dodgers again are slim and non-existent, I will go ahead with this post. He unretired, went on the IL, then decided to call it quits on May 24th. Taylor was born in Virginia Beach VA on August 29th, 1990. He attended Great…

Discussion (86)
Disagree, not disagreeable
Andrew –
I agree completely with your comments. I also appreciate a professional athlete like Ohtani who understands the concept of “team” success rather then have an “all about me attitude!” I hope that catches on in the sports world – professional on down to high school levels. That is an “old school attitude” but that is what I am….
I want to wish everyone on this extraordinary Dodger site that is manned predominately by Mark and Bear with all its insightful informative articles,and tireless work, a Happy, Healthy Holiday Season. We are very fortunate to be Dodger fans and should enjoy Shohei Ohtani the person and player and not worry about the amount of the contract. This is a once in a lifetime player with enormous talents we have all have not experienced before. Cheers to the upcoming championship years ahead of us.
I think Roberts made it clear that Mookie will be full-time at 2B. Last season, Mookie shuttled between 2B and RF after the Dodger brass lost patience with Miguelito’s struggles.
Heyward will play RF against righthanded pitching. His platoon partner, right now, figures to be righty hitters Taylor or DeLuca. If Mookie was to move to RF when Heyward sits against lefties, then righthanded hitter like Vargas, Taylor or Rojas would play at 2B. It wouldn’t be the lefty-swinging Busch, unless he has reverse splits.
So Busch is unlikely to play 2B unless something bad happens to Mookie.
That leaves LF as the best opportunity for Busch–but it’s an opportunity shared by Vargas and DeLuca as well.
Of those three players, DeLuca is the one true outfielder, with the greatest speed. In his brief time in the majors, he outhit both Busch and Vargas. With a great spring, DeLuca might even take over LF, much as Outman surprised his critics last Spring. But we obviously can’t count on that.
As Mark has mentioned, DeLuca could platoon with Outman. But playing them in a platoon could stunt their progress.
Keeping all three–Busch, Vargas, DeLuca–would ensure that none of them really have that “runway” to prove themselves. One or two will have much better opportunities if they are traded for guys like Burnes, Cease, Beiber or Glasnow.
The Dodgers’ biggest problem is the quality of the rotation, in particular the lack of a true ace. Solving the prospect logjam can fix the problem.
If the Dodgers can’t figure out LF with players on the roster, there is no shortage of good options on the free agent market.
Yammamoto incoming, just makes too much sense.
I can’t believe we’d target Hader, mainly due to contract length and losing another draft pick, but this dude thinks othertwise:
Open on bleacherreport.comhttps://bleacherreport.com/articles/10100824-mlb-rumors-josh-hader-eyed-by-dodgers-after-ohtani-contract-amid-yamamoto-pursuitI am not satisfied with one Championship per decade (it should have been two, but I digress), it’s also very apparent to me that things have changed. If I have to explain how, the odds are (1) You think winners built Las Vegas; and (2) The team with the best record or talent wins.
The fact that a team wins 100 games makes them a contender. In 2023, there were too many pitching injuries, but stranger things have happened, and it is a crapshoot, no matter what anyone thinks.
It didn’t used to be. Before the playoffs, a team had at least a 50/50 chance. “Statistics and Probability 101” taught me that!
From the WSJ:
Open on www.wsj.comhttps://www.wsj.com/sports/baseball/mlb-postseason-crapshoot-braves-dodgers-orioles-9e85924cIn part:
The word that baseball executives utter most frequently each October comes not from the diamond, but the casino floor. “Crapshoot” has become the game’s go-to way of describing the experience of guiding a team through the MLB playoffs.
It is used most frequently to explain why teams that were powerful during the 162-game regular season are vulnerable to being unceremoniously bounced from the playoffs in early rounds. The crapshoot effect is trotted out almost annually as a way to understand why the Los Angeles Dodgers—who have won more than 100 games five times since 2017—have only one World Series title, in the pandemic-shortened 2020 season.
“Crapshoot” is also a favored phrase of Yankees general manager Brian Cashman, whose team missed the postseason for the first time since 2016 and hasn’t been to a World Series since 2009.
The first “crapshoot” outcome of this postseason came when the 84-win Arizona Diamondbacks swept the 92-win Milwaukee Brewers in the three-game wild-card series. It was the same when the Tampa Bay Rays—winners of 99 regular-season games—were quickly ousted from the postseason by a 90-win Texas club. You’ll hear about it again next week if the Dodgers or Braves, winners of 100 and 104 games respectively in 2023, stumble in their division series to the Phillies and Diamondbacks.
The use of the term “crapshoot,” like most things in the sport these days, dates back to the book “Moneyball” by Michael Lewis. In it, then—A’s general manager Billy Beane called the amateur draft a “crapshoot.” Later, Beane describes the playoffs as “luck,” and Lewis assigns the word “crapshoot” to the concept of the playoffs, too.
“I did play a little bit of craps in Puerto Rico in 1985 when I was in Winter Ball,” Beane said this week. “Beyond that, I wish I could think of a cute and funny way to describe why I chose ‘crapshoot.’”
It’s a term—and sentiment—that has risen in baseball over the past 20 years as probabilistic thinking has penetrated every corner of the industry, at a time when the playoff format itself has expanded to include up to four series. The latter makes it a much longer road to the World Series than the simple days when the top team in each league squared off in the Fall Classic.
The expanded postseason, which now includes three wild-card teams and a three-game wild-card round before the division series, has seemed to increasingly separate the odds of winning a World Series from the success over a 162-game season.
Orioles assistant general manager Sig Mejdal, a former blackjack dealer turned baseball analyst, has considered the luck element of the postseason extensively throughout his nearly 20-year career in baseball. What does the postseason tell us, if not who is the best team in baseball this year?
“It tells you who plays the best in these five and seven game samples, and it’s tremendously exciting,” Mejdal said.
The rise of randomness and luck as baseball has expanded the postseason raises the question of whether it’s good for entertainment, or an affront to everything the regular season represents.
“This is the business we’ve chosen, and you understand that what we do has some random parts to it,” said Dodgers general manager Brandon Gomes. “That’s what’s frustrating about baseball, and also what’s beautiful about it.”
There’s a reason the game of “craps” is an apt metaphor for executives instead of more skill-based casino games like blackjack. Success in baseball is a mix of skill and luck, and the two elements generally tend to balance out over the span of a 162-game regular season. In a breakneck postseason made up of short series, however, executives feel the element of “skill” becomes less prevalent and “luck” takes center stage.
“My s___ doesn’t work in the playoffs,” Beane famously said in “Moneyball.” “My job is to get us to the playoffs. What happens after that is f______ luck.”
This turned out to be unsatisfyingly true for the A’s, who have reached the postseason 11 times since 2000. They advanced beyond the ALDS once, and were swept in that ALCS appearance in 2006.
Historical postseason data seems to be on the side of the executives. According to research from Stats Perform, dating back to 1995, the team with a better regular season record is 116-100 in postseason series, which amounts to a 53.7% rate of success. Additionally, teams with a home-field advantage in a postseason series have won 54.3% of the time dating back to 1995.
A 54-46 split in outcomes for the statistically better team is, still, better than the odds a craps player faces when he plays at a table, but the advantage remains slim. When success in any given postseason series is little more than a coin flip, it only reinforces the idea—presented most prominently by Beane—that a front office’s job is to simply get a team to the playoffs and from there, their chances of winning or losing are just about equal.
Still, there are some within the game who are resistant to the idea that the postseason is a “crapshoot,” and are wary of the way the sentiment affects a team’s approach in October.
“I think that thinking the playoffs are 100% random is a disease,” said one longtime AL baseball operations executive who was not authorized to speak publicly about his team’s postseason strategy. “Pure scientific and statistical logic, sure, there’s a lot of luck and randomness. But when you treat that dogmatically, you dissociate yourself from the actual reality of human beings needing to be at max confidence and max focus to win that tournament.”
The question for executives is whether there is a way to engineer a higher rate of skill into this increasingly luck-based tournament.
“I definitely think there’s a difference between an optimized regular season team and an optimized postseason team,” said Phillies president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski. “In 1997, with the Marlins, we knew it would be difficult to have a better record than the Braves in the regular season. We thought that we would have a much better chance in a short series, given the way we were built.”
The 1997 Marlins, who finished behind the Braves in the NL East, did indeed win the World Series that year. The difference between a regular season team and postseason team, in Dombrowski’s opinion, is that a great regular season team needs roster depth and a great postseason team needs top-end talent.
The reality that even a great team faces a tough road to winning the championship can cause a practical, but unenthusiastic, mindset when it comes to the concept of winning. Is it better to be a 99-win team in the regular season that loses in a three-game wild-card series, or an 87-win team in the regular season that advances to the division series?
“It is very convenient for a general manager to say, I got them there,” said Dominic “The Dice Dominator” LoRiggio, a professional craps player who believes he has developed a dice rolling style that allows for replicable skill in the luck-based game. “I put the players together. And if they don’t make it any further, you know, it was a crapshoot.”
LoRiggio believes the comparison between baseball and craps is apt, even if it’s a convenient excuse for failure.
“Joe DiMaggio’s 56-game hitting streak had a bit of luck involved,” he said. “A quarter of an inch one way or another and the shortstop could have gotten to the ball. Any long roll with the dice, no matter how much skill you have [like myself] has some luck involved as well.”
The nature of baseball means that the best regular season team may not be the best postseason team. Player health, individual streaks, and luck have a significant impact on how equipped or ill-equipped a team is to run through the monthlong postseason. It’s an advantage to have a more skilled roster than your opponent when entering a series, but hardly significant enough to overcome the “luck and randomness” that make the postseason exciting and infuriating.
“The game employs a lot of really smart, brilliant young executives who have allowed my quote to age pretty well,” Beane said. “I felt the math was going to be on my side that the quote would age pretty well, but it was controversial at the time.”
Controversy, as it has done repeatedly over the past 20 years of baseball, has now become convention. Roll the dice, hit the ball, hope that kismet is rooting for your team’s side.”
Don’t confuse being smart with being weak!
I too believe in Vargas and Busch and would like to see them play. No more Peraltas please.