DH The Lightening Rod
I used to be against the DH, but then I became totally indifferent because it is not a question of it, but rather when. The DH in the NL is inevitable, get used to it. This is not the NLB and the ALB…it is MLB. MLB is the only professional sport where the rules are different for one group of teams compared to rules of another group of teams within
I used to be against the DH, but then I became totally indifferent because it is not a question of it, but rather when. The DH in the NL is inevitable, get used to it. This is not the NLB and the ALB…it is MLB. MLB is the only professional sport where the rules are different for one group of teams compared to rules of another group of teams within the same association. There is no 3-point play in the Western Conference of the NBA but not in the Eastern Conference. The playing fields are not 100 yards for the NFC and 110 yards for the AFC, as they are in the CFL. Rules are consistent. Sure the AL could end the DH and the two leagues could have consistent rules then, but that is NEVER going to happen. So, the DH is coming whether you like it or not.
The DH has existed in the AL since 1973. I do not see how the image of baseball has been damaged one bit because of the DH. If you are less than 50, chances are you have no real recollection of the game without the DH. Not my choice, but we now have a full time DH in the HOF (Edgar Martinez), and probably another in a few more years (David Ortiz). The DH in concept and now practice, has been accepted. I am not saying people have to love the idea, but with the inclusion of Edgar Martinez in the HOF, there is no going back.
But in light of rule changes in MLB, the DH is a minor blip. The big change in MLB came in 1969 when the pitching rules changed significantly. The most dramatic change was lowering of the pitcher’s mound from 15 inches to 10 inches. Many of us were around in 1968, AKA the “Year of the Pitcher”, and yet we are still fans after such a significant change to the game. In 1968, 7 individual pitchers had ERA’s less than 2.00, led by Bob Gibson’s unworldly 1.12 ERA. I am constantly reading in MLB publications about pitchers with ERA’s around the mid-4.00’s, which are described as “respectable”. In 1968, 13 of the 20 TEAMS had ERA’s less than 3.00, with the worst team ERA being 3.64. In 2018, there were no teams with a combined ERA less than 3.11 (Houston). The Dodgers were #2 at 3.38. That 1968 team ERA of 3.64 would have been #3 in 2018. In total, there were 13 teams with ERA’s less than 4.00, and 17 teams greater than 4.00, with Baltimore an embarrassing 5.18.
MLB was certainly concerned about the obvious resultant lack of offense. Seven teams hit .230 or less, with only three teams with a BA .252 or greater (2 at .252 and Cin at .273). NYY had the worst team BA with a .214. The ChiSox scored an average of 2.86 runs per game, with the Dodgers and Mets not much better with RPG less than 3.00. Carl Yastremski won the AL batting title with a .301 BA. Pete Rose led MLB with a .335 BA and a total of 6 MLB batters had a BA greater than .300.
On December 3, 1968, an MLB rules panel got together and voted to lower the mound 33.33% from 15” to 10” hoping to put offense back in a venue meant to entertain. In addition to the lowering of the mound, that same group changed the strike zone from:
“that space over home plate which is between the top of the batter’s shoulders and his knees when he assumes his natural stance. The umpire shall determine the Strike Zone according to the batter’s usual stance when he swings at a pitch” to:
“that space over home plate which is between the batter’s armpits and the top of his knees when he assumes a natural stance. The umpire shall determine the Strike Zone according to the batter’s usual stance when he swings at a pitch.”
This was just one of 6 strike zone changes from 1950. Below is a link to the strike zone changes from 1876 to today:
http://www.baseball-almanac.com/articles/strike_zone_rules_history.shtml
Is it any wonder that the AL was so concerned about the lack of offense so much that they instituted the DH? The idea of the DH was actually started in two 1969 ST games. On March 6, 1969, two games utilized what was called the Designated Pinch Hitter; two expansion teams, Montreal Expos and KC Royals, and NYY vs. Washington Senators. MLB nixed the idea at the time, but five minor leagues, including the AAA International League, adopted the DH in 1969.
Charley Finley and 7 other AL owners officially adopted the DH rule for the 1973 season on a three-year trial run, that has not gone away. In 1973, fittingly NYY and BoSox were the first to utilize the DH in a regular championship season game. The Yankees’ Ron Blomberg walked against Boston’s Luis Tiant. In 1973, the AL posted a higher batting average, which has remained intact through the 2018 season. In addition, attendance at AL games increased measurably.
In August of 1980, the NL actually met to vote on the use of the DH which was expected to pass at the time. However, when informed that the rule would not take effect until 1982, Philadelphia’s VP, Bill Giles, needed to confer with owner Ruly Carpenter before voting. He could not reach Carpenter and abstained. Pittsburgh GM, Harding Peterson, was instructed to vote with the Phillies, and also abstained. Final vote tally, four teams for the change (Braves, Mets, Cardinals, Padres), five against adopting the change (Cubs, Reds, Dodgers, Expos, Giants), and three abstentions (Phillies, Pirates, Astros). The Yes/No vote thusly failed.
MLB now wants to be consistent in their rules, MLBPA wants the universal DH rule, and the NL would welcome the additional offense. Thus, the push to give the NL the DH as soon as possible. I do think NL teams may have acted differently this winter were they aware of the possibility of the DH coming in 2019, but I believe that it was the DH’s that were harmed more than the teams. Players like Nelson Cruz would have had a multitude of NL teams interested in his bat had the DH been adopted after the WS. Even teams like the Tigers could have received quite a haul for Nicholas Castellanos had he been available as a NL DH this year, or Edwin Encarnacion.
Apparently, MLB believes that there needs to be a metamorphosis to enhance offense, which owners believe sells. There is now talk about moving the pitching mound back, which the MLBPA has reportedly NOT said no to. Also, more talk on lowering the mound even more. The strange thing is that with more offense, the games will undoubtedly get longer, but neither side has used that argument. If MLB wanted to reduce the length of games, they should go back to pre-1968 and raise the mound by 5 inches, back to 15. Pitching will once again dominate, reducing the number of base runners, and the additional time tending to base runners. So, it is not the length of the game that is the most pressing bullet point in change, but offense. If the game is exciting, the less relevant the length of the game seems. At least that is how I read the tea leaves.
While the DH seems to be a lightening rod of sorts, it really is not that massive of a change that will turn off even the most ardent of the DH detractors over a long period of time. Just like the 10-inch mound, AL DH, instant replay, the game moves forward and memories seem shorter. The DH coming to the NL will not have any impact for me on the game that I love.
More from Dodger Talk
The Greatest Pitcher EVER – 1 Season!
Yesterday, it was said that Sandy Koufax was the greatest pitcher ever…. and I agree with that IF YOU JUST LOOK AT HIS LAST 5 SEASONS! However, in his first 7 seasons, he was really bad, then bad, then pretty good. Then, in his last 5 seasons, he became GREAT! However, what if…
Clayton Kershaw, Sandy Koufax… and Pete Rose
Yesterday, it was mentioned that Clayton Kershaw has never had Tommy John Surgery after seventeen years in the league. It was my opinion that this occurred because Clayton made a conscious decision not to throw with maximum effort on each pitch. There was a time early in his…
Baseball's Past is An Important Part of the Future
Many fans around today know little of the game of baseball’s history. Its past is filled with colorful characters. Some performed at levels today’s stars will never reach, especially on the pitching side of the game. It is a safe bet that no one ever approaches 511 wins. I would…
The Hall of Fame: Who Should Not Be In?
The election for the Hall of Fame was held last week. Scott Rolen was the only player getting the requisite 75 or more percent of the vote. Todd Helton, former Rockies’ first baseman, fell short by 11 votes. There were some who questioned Rolen’s Hall worthiness. Today’s voters…
Discussion (101)
Disagree, not disagreeable
So, I have been sorting some photos tonight:
TWENTY YEARS LATER:
Dang, I’ll be 70 when the next CBA is ratified. My daughter will be 42. She acts her age… but I don’t!
BTW, she is a mortician… pic was at the Funeral Home.
I agree with 59. No DH. I would much rather have a pitcher try to move a runner over with a bunt, even if he fails than watch a DH strike out swinging for the fence. Had my fill of that approach last year and that without the DH.
Watching the manager navigate the pitching changes and other options seems more interesting then having a DH.
As a matter of fact I pretty much like the game as it is. Didn’t realize there was anything wrong with it.
Mark, Getting the edit option was great. Next request: an “Ignore” option.
I think there is great reason to be worried about the new MLBPA Agreement. The MLBPA doesn’t like the fact that the rich owners aren’t giving out stupid, moronic, insane, dumb, idiotic, asinine, long-term deals to players. They are going to dig in. There could be a work stoppage.
–
If I were an owner, I would dig in, call up a AAA and AA team of players. Triple their salaries, re-mburse the minor league teams and cut tickets by 75%. I would wait them out. Tony Clark would put out a hit on me.
Well, I am very happy to hear that the DH is NOT coming to the beloved National League for at least 3 more years. Thank God I don’t have to read more discussions on the subject for a while. I swear I really worked myself up on that subject. Just like the prospect of the Dodgers signing Bryce Harper, I choose to believe that the DH in the NL is NOT inevitable until it happens. Plus, I can’t wait to watch Tony Gonsolin hit! Yes, that’s right. I love watching pitchers hit, even Rich Hill. And I love it when they’re proficient at getting a bunt down.
I think it is possible would give a 3-5 year $35 Million a year deal to Harper, even though they say they will not go over the LTT. They would get back under it next year.
–
The thing is, they do not have to do it to win, but if it helps their chances then they would likely be in.
–
The issue of Mike Trout came up earlier and you need to realize that the Mike Trout who will maybe be a free agent will be 30 that year. So far, we have been watching the 19 to 27 year-old Mike Trout. If you sign him at age 30, you are running a huge risk. Even a 5 year deal could blow up in your face. How will he age? I know this, he won’t be in his prime anymore.
–
The Dodgers are looking for the next Mike Trout, but if you sign the 30 year-old Mike Trout to a 10-year deal, I would bet money, you will crash and burn.
–
The MLBPA is preparing for a bitter fight in 3 years and Manfred (who was in favor of the DH) is not going to give them anything now… as Tony Clark and the rest are posturing. He will save it until 2021, so I think it’s dead until then. That’s a shame.
If Harper signs a two or three year deal I think he’ll be a Giant. Don’t see the Dodgers still needing him after the Pollock signing.
It still seems highly unlikely, but apparently Harper is looking at possibly accepting a two or three year contract which could bring the Dodgers back in play. It makes sense to sign a three year deal and have it run out when the CBA is due to expire and he could be in position for another large payday after MLB gets their hand spanked because they do not want to hand out the outrageous contracts. You know revenue share to players is going to be a big discussion, and the big money clubs will undoubtedly get back in the game.
**MEDIA ADVISORY**
–
DODGER PITCHERS AND CATCHERS REPORT TO SPRING TRAINING TUESDAY
–
WHAT: Dodger pitchers and catchers report to Spring Training on Tuesday, Feb. 12. Manager Dave Roberts will be available to the media at approximately 10:30 a.m. at Camelback Ranch-Glendale.
WHEN: Tuesday, February 12
Approx. 10:30 a.m. –Dave Roberts available to media
–
WHERE: Camelback Ranch-Glendale
10712 West Camelback Road
Phoenix, AZ 85037
–
MISC: Dodger pitchers and catchers will have their first workout on Wednesday, February 13, with the full-squad reporting on Feb. 18 and holding its first workout the following day.
Much has been made of the height of the mound being 15 inches until 1969 being the greatest factor in the plummeting of run scoring and offensive productivity. In my opinion, however, the greater factor may have very well been the raising of the top of the strike zone to the top of the shoulders from the armpits as was noted by AC in an article he wrote and highlighted in this post. Almost no hitter can hit the high strike consistently and raising that height 4-5 inches made it almost impossible for the batter to also be ready for the breaking ball down in the strike zone.
I think we have to remember there is a difference between length of games and pace of play.
–
I would like to see sub 3 hour games but that is not the major problem.
–
Pace of play is how quickly things move from one event to another. Shortening that interval is where changes will have an effect. Pitch clock, not stepping out of the batters box, decreased pitching changes, decreased mound visits are all things that will directly increase pace of play. Lowering the mound may indirectly increase the pace by putting more balls in play.
–
These changes may also decrease game length but that is just a bonus.
–
Electronic balls and strikes is more of a consistency issue that pace—I’m all in on that given some of the inconsistent strike zones we are seeing.
–
I’ve given up fighting the DH. I don’t like it but it’s happening, so just do it. I’m fine with it in 2019.
So much for the DH for the time being:
Open on www.mlbtraderumors.comhttps://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2019/02/manfred-designated-hitter-dh-universal-national-league-nl-rejects.htmlDodgers Non Roster Invitees to ML Camp:
.
Pitchers:
• RHP Stetson Allie
• RHP Joe Broussard
• RHP Daniel Corcino
• RHP Tony Gonsolin
• RHP Dustin May
• RHP Kevin Quackenbush
• LHP Josh Smoker
• RHP Jesen Therrien
• RHP Mitchell White
.
Catchers:
• Will Smith
• Josh Thole
.
Infielders:
• Daniel Castro
• Omar Estevez
• Gavin Lux
• Jake Peter
.
Outfielders:
• Ezequiel Carrera
• Kyle Garlick
• Paulo Orlando
• Cameron Perkins
• DJ Peters
• Shane Peterson
Here is an article on Brock Stewart that is more favorable than what I generally read as comments here.
Open on www.dodgersnation.comhttps://www.dodgersnation.com/2018-dodgers-player-review-brock-stewart/2019/02/08/?utm_source=DNList&utm_campaign=17f853c085-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d4639aeeb7-17f853c085-35527811I dislike the DH – it removes too much strategy from the game. And I don’t see why the NL and AL have to have the same rules.
–
Look at how long games used to take to play. The big culprit in pace of play is multiple pitching changes and then the little chess match on switching hitters and pitchers once a change has been announced.
–
Average game length 1960: 2:38
1977: 2:25
2000: 2:58
2012: 3:00
2017: 3:08
Recent rule changes brought the time down from 3:08 to 3:04 in 2018.
–
Pitchers per game per team 1960: 2.45
1977: 2.53
2000: 3.54
2012: 3.99
2017: 4.22
–
Pinch hitters per game per team 1960: 1.56
1977: 1.21
2000: 1.19
2012: 1.14
2017: 1.13 (note: the AL started using the DH in 1973 so PH/g went down.)
–
The other thing that has changes is pitches/plate appearance. Baseball Reference.com has records that only go back to 1999, but between 1999 and 2018 P/PA has increased from 3.74 to 3.90. So – if speeding up the game is the be all and end all, do we require hitters to swing earlier in the count and reduce the number of pitches thrown in the game? Or maybe encourage better contact and fewer strikeouts (which would also have the advantage of making the game more interesting to watch)?
–
I am against the DH, however if it is necessary to make a change go all out. Increase the roster to 30 and have an offense and a defense. Why should you make a place for a player who can hit but not field any more than making a place for a player who is an excellent fielder but can’t hit? Some players would play both ways
Sorry I’m a true blue dodgers fan but I have to say being the best in the national league doesn’t win you a ws ring! We have been to the world series 2 years and a row and got our butt handed to us, so yeah I’m a little pissed that there not going all in on some players! I’ve never turned my back on the dodgers nor will I ever, but I feel there not trying enough to go all in and win a world series. Screw the analytics of baseball and play ball! Go for the players that have proven themselves
OK, you lost me on that one.
It’s time for Dodger Business. This front office will make an excuse to not sign Mike Trout.
Most others in on Realmuto were willing to surrender 1 big piece but not a 2nd big piece. Marlins sought 2 of May, Lux, Ruiz and Smith from LA (after it was clear Bellinger was going nowhere) and 2 of Riley, Pache and a big pitching prospect (ie Wright, Wilson, Anderson) from ATL
Without the DH I believe Muncy will be the starting second baseman. He has expressed that second is his favorite position (probably because it is the only open starting spot), lost weight to increase his range/speed and he was already the 6th fastest guy on the team. I just feel that he will surprise us this spring with his defense.
I am with Mark and at this point in time I would like to see this line up. Only platoons in right and left unless Verdugo hits so well that he has to be in the line up everyday.
LF Joc / CT3
SS Cory
3B JT
1B Cody
CF Pollock
2B Muncy
RF Verdugo/Kiki
C Barnes
I can’t wait to get started. Years ending in 9 haven’t always been kind to the Dodgers, but this year will be the 60th anniversary of our 1959 World Championship.
Kill or at least modify the shift and offense will increase. 34000 instances of the shift last year??? That is nuts. Too many traditional ‘up the middle’ hits are taken away. It is soooo frustrating to watch.
Having a clock is a must to curtail subjective mental states of pitchers and coaches. We all remember how Baez would take his sweet time between pitches and most of us complained about it. It’s boring waiting for a pitcher like that to finally throw the darn ball. 20-25 seconds seems logical and doable. All other pitching modifications seem like an affront to creative management during a game. Why shouldn’t a pitcher be brought into the game for 1 pitch or 1 batter? This is what a manager might feel appropriate for the situation. Why shouldn’t situations like this be left up to the club? This is where the individual steps up with creative tactics. If Doc wants to screw the pooch later in the game by using his arsenal of relievers mid-game, that’s his choice as manager. If it works, call him a genius. If it doesn’t, call him out! A good manager will know what he’s got and who can do the job the most efficiently.
Switching gears, the big 4 are still out there and I think the Dodgers have another move left in them. There are some interesting candidates left unsigned for a minor league deal with ST invite. I like Buchholz, maybe Fister or Storen and would Adam Jones take such a deal? Evan Gattis is unsigned and hoping the DH is expanded this season. Cargo, Gio and Marwin Gonzales; catchers like Weiters, Hundley and Maldonado; former friends Forsythe, AJ Ellis, Romo, Hudson, Hatcher, Ballerina Brett, Hanley, Axford and Madson plus a bunch of other guys with names like Moose, E. Santana, Gallardo, etc. I’m not saying the Dodgers should be in on all these guys, just that at this late hour there are a lot of players still unsigned including the 4 biggest FA’s. There will be some bargains here and some will pay off, time to get busy Andrew!